Saturday, October 12, 2019
space :: essays research papers
 People arguing over shuttle costs on the net are usually arguing from  different assumptions and do not describe their assumptions clearly,  making it impossible to reach agreement. To demonstrate the difficulty,  here are a range of flight cost figures differing by a factor of 35 and  some of the assumptions behind them (all use 1992 constant dollars).       $45 million - marginal cost of adding or removing one flight from        the manifest in a given year.       $414 million - NASA's average cost/flight, assuming planned flight        rates are met and using current fiscal year data only.       $1 billion - operational costs since 1983 spread over the actual        number of flights.       $900 million - $1.35 billion - total (including development) costs        since the inception of the shuttle program, assuming 4 or 8        flights/year and operations ending in 2005 or 2010.       $1.6 billion - total costs through 1992 spread over the actual        number of flights through 1992.  For more detailed information, see the Aviation Week Forum article by  Roger A. Pielke, Jr.: "Space Shuttle Value Open To Interpretation", July  26, 1993, pg. 57. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE SATURN V PLANS  Despite a widespread belief to the contrary, the Saturn V blueprints  have not been lost. They are kept at Marshall Space Flight Center on  microfilm. The Federal Archives in East Point, GA also has 2900 cubic  feet of Saturn documents. Rocketdyne has in its archives dozens of  volumes from its Knowledge Retention Program. This effort was initiated  in the late '60s to document every facet of F-1 and J-2 engine  production to assist in any future re-start.  The problem in re-creating the Saturn V is not finding the drawings, it  is finding vendors who can supply mid-1960's vintage hardware (like  guidance system components), and the fact that the launch pads and VAB  have been converted to Space Shuttle use, so you have no place to launch  from.  By the time you redesign to accommodate available hardware and re-modify  the launch pads, you may as well have started from scratch with a clean  sheet design. Other references:  Several AIAA papers delivered in recent years discuss reviving the  Saturn V. For example, AIAA paper 92-1546, "Launch Vehicles for the  Space Exploration Initiative". This paper concluded that a revived  Saturn V was actually cheaper than the NLS vehicle.  An overview of the infrastructure still available to support production  of a 1990s Saturn V and how that vehicle might be used to support First  Lunar Outpost missions can be found in the December 1993 issue of  _Spaceflight_, published by the British Interplanetary Society.  WHY DATA FROM SPACE MISSIONS ISN'T IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE    					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.